Jump to content
TBoneTX

George Stephanopoulos Spotted Blowing Off Mask Mandate In New York

 Share

23 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Belgium
Timeline
3 minutes ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

"The Right"

 

cjrQ2jd.png

6mkWbQh.png

DNteSW0.png

TJxjgju.png

 

ft7y3lx.gif

Yes, because I said exclusively the right. Oh wait, I didn't.
Who keeps pushing the investigation into the emails and even Benghazi again and again?

Why even bother googling her?

Edited by sl1pstream
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, sl1pstream said:

Yes, because I said exclusively the right. Oh wait, I didn't.
Who keeps pushing the investigation into the emails and even Benghazi again and again?

Why even bother googling her?

"And yet, the right can't stop bringing her up every chance they get."

 

Looks like it was exclusive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Belgium
Timeline

So you're saying is that no one is bringing her up and that there wasn't a comment mentioning her in the first place? Cool. Cool, cool, cool.

If she was that irrelevant, y'all wouldn't bring her up, even if others were. If she really was irrelevant, there wouldn't be a need to mention her again. But somehow her winning the popular vote is still something no one seems to be able to get over. Which is great, it's clearly something that you're still not okay with and that's hilarious.

Edited by sl1pstream
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sl1pstream said:

So you're saying is that no one is bringing her up and that there wasn't a comment mentioning her in the first place? Cool. Cool, cool, cool.

"The right"

"No one"

 

Keep going.. 

 

2 minutes ago, sl1pstream said:

So you're saying is that no one is bringing her up and that there wasn't a comment mentioning her in the first place? Cool. Cool, cool, cool.

 

I wonder if "the right" were the first two people bringing her up in the thread..  

 

22 hours ago, spookyturtle said:

He’s about as relevant as Hillary. 

13 hours ago, sl1pstream said:

And yet, the right can't stop bringing her up every chance they get.

Yep, truth confirmed.  :whistle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
6 hours ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

"The right"

"No one"

 

Keep going.. 

 

 

I wonder if "the right" were the first two people bringing her up in the thread..  

 

Yep, truth confirmed.  :whistle:

www.burntreynolds.com now surpasses snopes.com in actually debunking false claims.  :rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

It's OK, everyone.  She'll be the VP choice and will assume her rightful position very soon after the 25th Amendment or an oh-so-tragic Arkancide is invoked.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...